| Re: [eigen] Eigen::FFT and Eigen::Complex in repo |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Eigen::FFT and Eigen::Complex in repo
- From: Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:39:26 +0530
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=H7O81eyiDqsJ5qOcPbNS47IyO7eAN2LzvMJTR7YjfOM=; b=StzkccNQJl30PY7UFL7XWHNjD95Numh3RTkhK5k7AQ4GY9PxFQ2G7m1k74VNzbGIuO plUM/SuwK3qdzWrqtT+8RbEfOac74O5HrZ4YOshLy8T7OfCTWC6YooAbNwL/nRZ6xeYE bFxyRbwIT25cBOKO0/1JWM9x9C/2VwVMRskQ8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Snc3wOzi7I45BaMUbeWGZ+9kDp4YWaodA9SbxoQGQkQpVDaNkJPiVgDZZ5UcFwlsf0 7zf6LU1AoV8BhYGVm2pVTEFS9we8ZMgpXOkEueg0CYDd6fi5fRmu+j5bkadLVYv85r5w sNobT9Py/zzIOlZMR5ucFblWxjaBQ4VjfQcss=
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For example we're soon going to replace namespace Eigen to "ei" and
> now it pays off to have centralized that.
Please no. Eigen is so much better than "ei" :| AFAIK, major c++
libraries (apart from perhaps the stl) avoid unix like naming
conventions :)
>
>>
>>
>> (to be continued)
>
> Can't wait for the next episode!
>
> And, another TODO point: what about fixed size? Currently, even if we
> pass a MatrixBase, the size at compile time isn't used. I don't know
> anything about FFT but seem to remember that people did have a use for
> a fixed-size FFT.
>
> Benoit
>
>
>
--
Rohit Garg
http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
Senior Undergraduate
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology
Bombay