| Re: [eigen] Rigid Transformations in eigen: discussion thread |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Rigid Transformations in eigen: discussion thread
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:23:34 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AvQ6vrK5Xk0ANqPalOQ50b8Un3ZlOmaBeycWvWT17cU=; b=NjHNnCHJdYDyNT7oCFSNkVe+ZWRAegkI/0CfYU9YxkVYE6HiVZi0S6f+VxjY9k2UZJ eBkwe1tUIEI3JdV1n8OfAZB9o2wF7YxK++4qAod6SKBjxb9d3fpx/O6Cy9E87xEoiB2I +MaYhZhLbQUtZlOalQHLqzJ8QjpGHYTAAQKB8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ieZqe+SPP+xA0BvJ4cK49/P9YNDTjl5wAjt3DGalYYHQM6lry0h4Et7SiBZIuMXtAa xDClxIaWVu2TCYzCVVvOwWqVyDV/+OYl70ghCNgvVGz3XS676BGdvD0pCmTNQWyFjncN GbyktGjfIqJkdnyHmqNsxSVuvrDf0xlK1pZC8=
2009/9/17 Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>:
> If you are talking about AVX, then AFAIK, it won't need 32 byte
> alignment. It'll happily work with 16 byte aligned pointers.
ah OK, but perhaps we shouldn't rely on such hardware details, if we
want future-proof code!
Fortunately, this can be changed at a later date without affecting the
API and ABI.
Still, i am thinking that it is slightly more future proof to allocate
a vector8 and map as quaternions, than the inverse.
Benoit