[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [eigen] Re: 2.0.5 soon?
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:27:27 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nQ/Zwc+cF5Zs++MjpSaFKHn86wIeviP3yHvJxCOHh6M=; b=bTpCmwyruxqLkd+vlR2cLIdh43jOyuekPjBk1FlAVpEJiMxN24zpk7F+K4P1xm+HcC hXzlkPe7KjRJr1Vheb1fM0LCML0d7DRIAyiBah6WvMzfrFRLd2rIneEEdWNBKW8z8EUx XrvlLb4X8H3iwO9bDH+/S9qdmvbv4QZIZjZ1A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ExMktqmSWpOGgroqN6RqxKiFrJQB/XvffWGpSIcBF8dHpZqRWA0b65my6vwS7j3FgU XC1R6x93Kbq3pNTlBwAGDc1XTpvPKnPfpAF1KanYKXnItBnT6qarU5iVrbR77ByxuGKO wKI6A/H3lwyOv8iTFLHckCQXObjM0hOLm3R4s=
....and just another big bug fix went in, affecting large products: the
storage order wasn't always correctly honored, leading to a
"transposed" result.
If you have code that does large (>= 20x20) matrix products involving
mixed storage orders (for example if you have a lot of .transpose() /
..adjoint() expressions involved) then it's worth testing the 2.0
branch before we release 205.
Benoit
2009/8/21 Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2009/8/21 Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> patches have accumulated in the 2.0 branch; today a big compilation
>> issue was fixed for g++ 4.1 users and the StdVector header.
>
> So, what is most helpful is if you can test Eigen/StdVector --- for
> example building and running the stdvector unit-test, or your own app
> --- against various compilers. I only tested g++ 4.1 and 4.4.
>
> Benoit
>