[eigen] Re: 2.0.5 soon?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

....and just another big bug fix went in, affecting large products: the
storage order wasn't always correctly honored, leading to a
"transposed" result.

If you have code that does large (>= 20x20) matrix products involving
mixed storage orders (for example if you have a lot of .transpose() /
..adjoint() expressions involved) then it's worth testing the 2.0
branch before we release 205.


2009/8/21 Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2009/8/21 Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Hi,
>> patches have accumulated in the 2.0 branch; today a big compilation
>> issue was fixed for g++ 4.1 users and the StdVector header.
> So, what is most helpful is if you can test Eigen/StdVector --- for
> example building and running the stdvector unit-test, or your own app
> --- against various compilers. I only tested g++ 4.1 and 4.4.
> Benoit

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/