| Re: [eigen] Re: LU precision tuning |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Re: LU precision tuning
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:05:04 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cjCBkK0a/qvAvxoj006a6dRmUT4c7vsT1vfDU/bt1qA=; b=PLT/RbIEURNVvwqg1UBUGgFtRkrGL8n0sGxvlep4wDO47O0GoTsULdrKr0sJRjJ5r8 JA8DNySm2AuOgH4w3ZInfekHvIdH1U1GXdsm+x9h8PjxpzpWjlIG82FNrARR03w1T6jV 02gCbLjGg0zIwkFLkek1M1XySmeUNbEephnlE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cZH6HoLryL72jWdqXe1QETTixnupcaZfAMK2X6UKJ3bR8HwN/Ix0VkGBDhS9N/6QFu iYU73UQQ84iI2Od1eRF2iNoAyMR9Q3v5psVNLPhNROhbI/MlbZqlnktEUZC3QApkfNYR 9sCBL9sGbVNkSJlphssfZmZnsIE0r1N9wsLew=
2009/5/8, Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> My findings indicate that the bound Benoit defined also holds for
> complex numbers. Just take a look at the attached log file.
Thanks!
>
> Since the 2048 x 2048 decomposition test for complex numbers did not
> finish after full 8 hours I decided to terminate the program and
> simply submit the results computed so far.
Same here! There's quite a bit of room for improvement in performance
with complex numbers, but much of that would require us to have our
own complex class :(
Cheers,
Benoit