| Re: [eigen] overloaded operator new |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] overloaded operator new
- From: "Gael Guennebaud" <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:40:23 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=mv7Yvv4tQA7CK+44rl69bBYpdFK0Bvmuf/4/lqvRKXo=; b=UU9EchagTEVYIQHJ5bGm8V5KeHUevOP4c8UBb+FxV9US9CVlYT8k4+xvHvSJ9yGinS bWRhRgePoAQ/3+gYDTO6QtxhPx4LTPXK440mpoVRJdOVs05hEMqQtRwTVXo15PudV1hs 9804EUKqp9ZI89W1lq7dv/M6qOtngC42f9Kjc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Kw2pBndmufUfowYv70XDe7P7Ke3GmFdn7hHxl3qc+yB8QZNWTn8UmJMAzJv4Ih+x3s eSl8rmY5t4vH22NrXmmOxjbcUJMd7OXWoCRROzKqrHiFgKtGJmiT905PZQKozUnOUJvU ncsg4OM4TJTftpHbyvY512hUogH1nSpA1LRN4=
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Armin Berres <trigger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 09 18:27, Gael Guennebaud wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi List *cough* Gael *cough*
>> >
>> > Currently, we have:
>> >
>> > struct ei_with_aligned_operator_new : WithAlignedOperatorNew {};
>>
>> well, they are both struct (not class), so everything is always public.
>
> Ah, makes sense.
> But what about a class inheriting from Eigen::WithAlignedOperatorNew?
> Should it use public inheritance?
at least it would not harm !
---