|Re: [eigen] Re: LGPLv3 for a C++ Pure Template Library ?|
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 13:24:21 Michael Kesper wrote: > Why don't you adress licensing@xxxxxxx ? Because I didn't know about this list -- despite having looked for "licensing" and "mailing lists" on the fsf.org website. Anyway I have looked into this issue more closely in the meanwhile, and have concluded by myself that the LGPLv3 does solve the problems of the LGPLv2 with respect to #included C++ code. Cheers, Benoit
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
|Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+||http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/|