Re: [eigen] Re: LGPLv3 for a C++ Pure Template Library ?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

On Thursday 07 February 2008 11:45:30 Shane Martin Coughlan wrote:
> I have passed your question on to Brett Smith at the FSF licensing lab.

Many thanks!

>    If you no longer need our assistance please let me know.

Well, since I am no lawyer, I am always happy to receive informed advice.

My understanding was that the LGPL3 does indeed cover the case of C++ template 
libraries -- namely in its Section 3, "Object Code Incorporating Material 
from Library Header Files".

I am still interested in a confirmation/infirmation that I got that right.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+