Re: [eigen] Bug in traspose |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Bug in traspose
- From: "Schleimer, Ben" <bensch128@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:59:55 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=5tx+w3ts2kIzw9W0SWPKAOM9fKRifbdjCB11Cu7Ceu5bEl5Pk6u5+LXR6bYN00cb0HM4ewxv4gj7wlVIvXft5d3OnZ3rZR4mXrm6PcQTjep51PSApmDUjJWHs26gxvjskTOuuEVhab40FMxHp05apAJ1xdnRi0CZPRMz6f9AlG0=;
Hi,
> 1) Tests can't be templated (because Qt signals and slots are not
> templatable). I would like to write a template testProduct<typename
> MatrixType>() and register testProduct<Matrix2d>, testProduct<MatrixXf> ...
No idea... maybe since the script only checks if the method name starts with "test" it'll work.
Needs to be tested though.
>
> 2) One can't add command-line options without bypassing QTestLib's default
> command line options. So in Eigen's tests we can't use QTestLib's options
> anymore like the one allowing to run only one specific test. (By the way does
> CxxTest allow running only one test?)
Either write a custom runner or dynamically create the list of tests to run.
I don't think there is an option though.
Cheers
Ben
>
> Ian: Thank you for the CMakeLists!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Benoit
>
> On Wednesday 16 January 2008 04:40:19 Schleimer, Ben wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > The fact that my unit-tests did not catch this bug is interesting (I can
> > > see the reason). I will keep that in mind for the next round of
> > > unit-tests improvements (alpha4?). I am also thinking that QTestLib is
> > > not very good for us, actually I am already bypassing large parts of it
> > > in the main() function, so we might get rid of it.
> >
> > I wanted to add that this bug is a perfect chance to demonstrate why unit
> > tests are *a really good idea*.
> > Implement a test which fails because of this bug and then change the code
> > to make the test pass. Then you'll have the bug squished forever. Dont just
> > fix the bug and then don't update your unit tests. Switching to a different
> > testing framework is not so important.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ben
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Benoit
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 15 January 2008 00:27:09 ollupaC De La Pradera wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I think there's a bug in Transpose.h, at least in current svn revision
> > > > (761491):
> > > > enum {
> > > > RowsAtCompileTime = MatrixType::Traits::ColsAtCompileTime,
> > > > ColsAtCompileTime = MatrixType::Traits::RowsAtCompileTime,
> > > > MaxRowsAtCompileTime = MatrixType::Traits::MaxRowsAtCompileTime,
> > > > MaxColsAtCompileTime = MatrixType::Traits::MaxColsAtCompileTime
> > > > };
> > > > should be:
> > > > enum {
> > > > RowsAtCompileTime = MatrixType::Traits::ColsAtCompileTime,
> > > > ColsAtCompileTime = MatrixType::Traits::RowsAtCompileTime,
> > > > MaxRowsAtCompileTime = MatrixType::Traits::MaxColsAtCompileTime,
> > > > MaxColsAtCompileTime = MatrixType::Traits::MaxRowsAtCompileTime
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > It's being more difficult that what I initially thought to refresh my
> > > > algebra and numerical methods while trying to understand all that
> > > > complex templates stuff, but I'm still here working even if I don't
> > > > show up a lot.
> > > >
> > > > By the way, I'm not sure if I have to post it here, or to some
> > > > bugzilla, or just send it to Jacob?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Ramon
>
>
>