Re: [AD] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Additional opengl functions |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: allegro-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Additional opengl functions
- From: SiegeLord <siegelordex@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:43:28 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/3lqLh8TNaDfTb0/4Il9q4bNCEpycK/sRBSn34MSHNg=; b=pNoETzaQ1nTghEOTfcAikBC3DW3LuN49QCldetlLzyCqWpLHTipNJWixDF6gzRtJh1 srkEQ8r/t2LlFKeIO2UMe5l72FE/BbWZ0QJRI3lr4INipnGwjzU7LzSKofXoOijokQD3 n7AbWkE54mzak4mOMttN/PviZjIgiYVkCWlemm97FwEnz44tn7z9/bS07UIuchVCrqq2 pKaOxlcDQnv9hJmsHK3aizuY7w2Z6PBM0CsTPGWanfgwgp8Az1rtsWsikG6sRL4NgBLo bH78HyR517Y6QqPghlrWsN3An4O0i9wZiEcW8eCc0HAfKR1e91zqu1Vm5fUeWSaXbKOv PaiA==
Nah, I appreciate a reminder. I'm forgetful and like to procrastinate.
I guess these things could make life easier for OpenGL people, and we
won't get to 1000 API entries if we never add new functions.
I guess if you fix the following issues, I'll add these in (unless
somebody speaks up against this).
- No need to put spaces in front of commas (also in the docs)
- Could you add a 'Since: 5.2.2' or whatever the version is these days
in the docs (see some other functions for the format of that note)
- No need to duplicate the comment about OpenGL ES
- Could you rename al_get_opengl_texture_coordinates to
al_get_opengl_texture_dimensions and change the parameter names to be in
terms of u and v vs x and y? Dimensions is what the font addon uses for
a similar function, so for consistency's sake I'd prefer this name.
-SL
On 11/30/2016 01:49 PM, Edgar wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Edgar* <edgarreynaldo@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:edgarreynaldo@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: [AD] Fwd: Re: Additional opengl functions
To: trent@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:trent@xxxxxxxxxx>
It certainly wasn't intended to come off as if I was telling anyone what
to do. I hadn't received a reply in over a week so I felt I should add
in a small reminder that I was waiting on an answer. SiegeLord did
originally say he could be swayed to include the functions, so I didn't
feel that the issue had been completely decided yet. There's no need to
be rude. You simply misinterpreted what I said, and how I said it.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 6:46 PM, <trent@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:trent@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Sun, November 27, 2016 7:39 pm, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
>> Nobody finds them useful, don't have a hissy fit... Everything is
>> already
>> available and we don't need repetitive bloat. Please don't reply with
>> another rant.
>
> I wouldn't say they arent useful. But people did express they didn't find
> them
> useful enough at the moment. Or perhaps they hadn't thought of all the
> potential use cases.
The part I didn't like was:
Edgar: here are some functions, what do you think?
Siege: I don't think I'll add them.
Edgar: Just a reminder, you haven't added the functions.
Siege: I said I didn't want to add them.
Edgar: <puke>
_______________________________________________
Allegro-developers mailing list
Allegro-developers@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Allegro-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers
<https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers>
_______________________________________________
Allegro-developers mailing list
Allegro-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers