Re: [AD] Bug triage

[SiegeLord <siegelordex@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd prefer to just keep them. With github's tag support, they don't 
really interfere, I think.

I'd be nice to relabel all the 4.9/5.0/5.1 bugs to something that 
doesn't involve a version though... perhaps 'A5'? I didn't explore if 
there are facilities to do mass relabelings like that.

-SL

On 08/26/2015 11:55 AM, Beoran wrote:
> Today I spent sometime reading all the bugs that SiegeLord imported from
> Sourceforge to Github, and I commented on some of them.
> I was only able to close one bug because I saw it had been resolved by
> studying the source code. My impression, though is that we should close
> all bugs that refer to allegro 4.4 or lower, but keep the 4.9 and higher
> ones that are still relevant. Does everyone agree with this approach?
> Also if you have time , could all of you you check any bugs that you
> reported yourself and see if they still apply, comment on them if they
> do, or close them if they are already fixed?
>
> Thanks in advance for your efforts!
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> B.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Allegro-developers mailing list
> Allegro-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers