Re: [AD] SF.net SVN: alleg:[13931] allegro/branches/5.1

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On 26 Nov 2010, at 11:33 , elias@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Removed ALLEGRO_VIDEO_BITMAP which masqueraded as a bit-field flag but was just 0 and therefore failed when using it like one (get_new_bitmap_flags() & ALLEGRO_VIDEO_BITMAP always failed).

Should we be removing documented symbols?
Wouldn't it be better to make it a proper bitflag?

Evert



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/