Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()

Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro Development <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
From: Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:31:42 -0400

On 6 Nov 2010, at 9:08 , Peter Wang wrote:
> Either way.  5.2 will not be ABI compatible with 5.0 anyway so that
> doesn't matter.

True. I was more thinking of 5.0.x than 5.2, but assuming we move to 5.2 faster than we did from 4.0 to 4.2, that shouldn't be an issue.
Should I delete the function now and commit?

Evert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
  - From: Peter Wang

References:
- [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
Next by Date: Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()
Next by thread: Re: [AD] al_get_frontbuffer()

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/