Re: [AD] About colors

[Pavel Sountsov <slabode@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:59 -0600, Trent Gamblin wrote:
> > On Mon, June 14, 2010 11:17 am, Pavel Sountsov said:
> > > I have absolutely no problem making rectangles/lines work like 
that as
> > > long as it does not mess up under transformations. I'll test this 
soon,
> > > and if it works, I'll make a patch for people to test (or just 
commit
> > > it straight away).
> >
> > Sounds good, I'll definitely test it.
> >
>
> Which change do you mean?
>
> rect(x, y, x + w, y + h) makes the most sense to me the way it is in 
A5,
> the A4 way meant the rectangle was not w/h but w-1/h-1 which easily 
led
> to off-by-one errors.

Yes, I suppose it does to me to. But, in that case, why not do have 
rect(x, y, w, h) to remove the last bit of confusion?

I don't actually have a preference myself, as long as the outline 
rectangle convention matches the filled rectangle convention.

-SiegeLord