[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
Attached is the (large) diff I generated using 'svn diff', let me know if
theres any problems. Or if its ok for me to merge fshook into 4.9. If its ok,
the fshook history is a bit of a mess, so I suppose it doesn't matter if we
merge, or just apply the patch.
Also I should note some of the api functions I planned aren't done, but are
fairly trivial (except maybe al_fs_find*).
The next TODO items to do should probably be fill in the rest of the al_path
methods, al_find*, turning the PACKFILE (and datafile) stuff into a new addon
and a fshook driver akin to the stdio driver, and maybe a PhysFS addon, or a
simple zip file addon.
Once the PACK and DATA file stuff is in the new packfile addon, it should make
some a4->a5 ports a little easier. allowing the use of the a4 api and exact
semantics and pack/data file formats, along side the new api with few issues.
(fshook allows normal seeking, packfile's don't)
p.s. sorry if compressing the attachment is annoying, but I doubt sf's lists
take a 360KB attachment.
p.p.s. sorry for the dup, the last message with the attachment got stuck in
the moderator queue
patch here: http://strangesoft.net/allegro-4.9-fshook.diff.gz
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx