Re: [AD] Should dllsyms.lst be there?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On 2007-11-25, Trent Gamblin <trentg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/25/07, Peter Wang <novalazy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes.  It should only be deleted and generated from scratch for unstable
> > series, or at the start of a stable series.  What error do you get?
> 
> The output I get is attached.

> Scanning for API symbols...
> Scanning for WinAPI symbols...
> Scanning for internal symbols...
> Checking against existing symbol list...
>  *** Error !!! ***
>   symbols missing => DLL binary compatibility broken
>   you need to add the following symbols:
>     _WinMain
>     __linear_vtable15 DATA
>     __linear_vtable16 DATA
>     __linear_vtable24 DATA
>     __linear_vtable32 DATA
>     __linear_vtable8 DATA
[snip]

Line 79 of fixdll.sh seems not to work.  My guess is one of the files is
empty or line ending differences.

Peter





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/