Re: [AD] Unix/Linux debug library so's

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

On 2006-09-13, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It seems theres a different way of naming debug libraries.
> Qt4.2 moved to having:
> and
> Apparently, valgrind and gdb automatically pick up the .debug lib when 
> loading.
> Should we think of doing the same thing, and drop the current named debug 
> libs?

Not that I don't believe you, but is the .debug convention documented
somewhere?  Just so we know if there are any other requirements, etc.


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+