|Re: [AD] Unix/Linux debug library so's|
[ Thread Index |
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
On 2006-09-13, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It seems theres a different way of naming debug libraries.
> Qt4.2 moved to having:
> QtCore.so.v.v.v and
> Apparently, valgrind and gdb automatically pick up the .debug lib when
> Should we think of doing the same thing, and drop the current named debug
Not that I don't believe you, but is the .debug convention documented
somewhere? Just so we know if there are any other requirements, etc.