[AD] [4.3] get_executable

[AD] [4.3] get_executable_name

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AD] [4.3] get_executable_name
From: Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:18:17 -0600

Just why does that function go out of its way to be as complicated as 
possible?

Are there really unix systems where you cant use getcwd (relative paths in 
argv) and argv[0] ?

There isn't any reasoning in usystem.c for the extra complexity.

What are the special cases I should be dealing with?

-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] [4.3] get_executable_name
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] [4.3] get_executable_name
  - From: Evert Glebbeek

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] universal binary of 4.2?
Next by Date: Re: [AD] [4.3] get_executable_name
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] universal binary of 4.2?
Next by thread: Re: [AD] [4.3] get_executable_name

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/