[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 20:35 +0100, Milan Mimica wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> >
> > rest(1) is enough to drop CPU usage and give time to for the input thread to
> > run. 50 just seems unnecessarilly long.
>
> rest(1) will wait about 20 ms anyway.
Only under OSX, Windows 98, or Linux kernels who set it to that. E.g. my
Linux kernel here, or AFAIK Windows XP, use 1ms.
> I don't mind, change it if as you
> like.
I noticed no problems with 50ms, but we use rest(1) everywhere, so I
changed it.
--
Elias Pschernig