Re: [AD] OSX x86 patch

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 18:45 +0200, Evert Glebbeek wrote:
> > Hm, this reminds me.. should I now commit that patch to completely get
> > rid of ALLEGRO_USE_C?
> 
> I think so, yes (but I still think it prudent to define ALLEGRO_USE_C if
> ALLEGRO_NO_ASM is defined for compatibility reasons). Also, what happens to
> the ALLEGRO_USE_C flag for make in Windows?
> 

Yes, ALLEGRO_USE_C would be defined in asm.inl, as alias to
ALLEGRO_NO_ASM. And the makefile define doesn't change at all.

-- 
Elias Pschernig





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/