[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Mixer patch
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:50:19 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=lX1CXKQL9S7tVw0Q7hgNPktDL5KxM9+TsSSxlOGHeN798RaKpn/6K2c82d6kVG7t7Yubw7xLLUc8SFucf8S/Vw0UguoehAFJAYaUSy5qeyrCR5f44rfVvd9BbvY2nHtGI0OHnUPr5hvPzo4ssXzdC5DVe9GrYvja4oyqbPZCRlU=
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 05:33, Peter Wang wrote:
> And is it just me, or is even quality=1 unbearably bad?
Quality 1 is simple point-resampling. If you use something close to the output
frequency it'll sound fine/better, but if you play something very low it'll
give you some noise problems, yeah. Quality 2 uses linear resampling which
produces better output, usually.
Quality 0 is also point-resampling, but it also downsamples the input to 8-bit
and runs it through a volume table (which is supposedly faster (barely)).