Re: [AD] stretch_blit GFX_HW_VRAM_BLIT ?

[Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 08:53 +1100, aj wrote:
> do the new accelerated hardware stretch_blit() going to have a 
> gfx_capabilities flag ?
> 
> GFX_HW_VRAM_STRETCH_BLIT
> 

Well, scrolling down to Evert's post, I can see this:

+#define GFX_HW_STRETCH_BLIT               0x00800000
+#define GFX_HW_STRETCH_BLIT_MASKED        0x01000000

But it's a good question.. the existing flags indicate if MEM, SYS or
VRAM blits are accelerated:

GFX_HW_VRAM_BLIT
GFX_HW_VRAM_BLIT_MASKED
GFX_HW_MEM_BLIT
GFX_HW_MEM_BLIT_MASKED
GFX_HW_SYS_TO_VRAM_BLIT
GFX_HW_SYS_TO_VRAM_BLIT_MASKED

So should the new flags indicate it as well? From what I understand, the
new stretch_blit would work for VRAM and SYS_TO_VRAM, so 4 new flags
instead of 2 new flags would be needed..

-- 
Elias Pschernig