| RE: [AD] build process overhaul |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> Yes, true - so it wouldn't be an optimal solution. My main motivation
> for automake is that so many projects seem to use it, so it can't be
> that bad..
Mostly to be able to build out of the box for more or less POSIX systems
that are not "supported", I think. It would be a tall order for Allegro
to be able to do that anyway :)
But I'm missing something here: Allegro's not using automake already ?
Is it using autoconf only maybe ? The configure script does mention
it's been generated by autoconf.
> > I don't like libtool. The command-line is hidden under a
> layer of magic
Same here. Apart from the "slow" argument, which I've not seen,
but then I haven't tried to use it for my own stuff.
That said, I have nothing against the move.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________