| Re: [AD] 4.3 graphic drivers |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] 4.3 graphic drivers
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:58:25 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Hi5BlVH91hf2sRneyW7ctj59G21vo+GN7dARq+kK4AvQLVWK5pl+u7XcwrvrInuG2cMlHuYqALAI1Fe47fenWyC83ZgiyXPv0cVZxr1+Uvlq9hPxqJVPvvvkUwp5YYTx0NktPJqfGbw1yCmuBf/61W/YV57pXHO3Bt22MD3G6WU=
On Friday 11 November 2005 01:31 am, Peter Hull wrote:
> I would vote for static vtables;
I'd personally like to avoid exposing structures in the API. It'll be a lot
nicer for people who want to try to dynamicly load Allegro, like if it's used
in a plug-in system or something.