RE: [AD] 4.2.0-rc2 -> 4.2.0 patch

["Vincent Penecherc'h" <Vincent.Penecherch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Nope. The problem is that the beta's and the RC's actually 
> carry the 4.2.0 
> version number, which can be a bit confusing. That's part of 
> the reason I 
> made the hidden. Another reason is that not all the RC's were 
> released 
> publicly anyway.

The one I got I think was (4.2.0-rc2) since IIRC I just went to
the Sourceforge site and got the latest one I could find. So I
think it would be useful if there was a patch from it, but that's
just me.
And about the "publicly available" thing, I guess the huge
majority of people who use update patches are the ones that
will update every time there's a new version, so it'd make sense
for the patches to be incremental (or name the patches with the
two versions they use, though it would annoy DOS users).

Now, I've just come back, so I really shouldn't try to change
the way you're doing things now... :)

Thanks. As long as I know what the problem was, it's easy to fix
for me anyway.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________