[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Subversion
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:02:04 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=HsyTiJjanLdoLsplzP3tBLh41BOTmqkD4YOd0ewLJebM7qyQfcPyYoGoJQqzfC8nnmJ9Ha/Xtt7A7M12Shpi8hlvKNONBtmjbQ2+uW/xMI/E+m6YDZVhV6PSDtJ7KRj2+7asQYLEACgPkSeC2RvNXWMmNZsm3DK3G73XRAHToPQ=
On November 2, 2005 12:52 pm, Peter Hull wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2005, at 07:38 pm, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> > Subversion is not beta. Only SF will provide a beta version at first..
> > but I really don't see how even SF can mess up much there.
>
> Yes, I know _Subversion_ isn't a beta product. However, SF have been
> slower than anticipated on recent projects (e.g. statistics) - I prefer
> to think the worst and not be disappointed ;)
Yeah.. Is the new CVS Pserver cluster up yet? they were supposed to get it up
within a couple months of announcing it, but many months later they hadnt
gotten it working..
> Pete
>
--
Thomas Fjellstrom