Re: [AD] Allegro 4.2.0 RC2

[Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:37 +0200, Michal Molhanec wrote:
> Another useless patch from the category "we don't like warnings" :-)
> 
> plain text document attachment (datfont.diff)
> --- datfont.c.old	Sun Jun  5 21:35:18 2005
> +++ datfont.c	Sun Aug 28 12:23:21 2005
> @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@
>     c = datedit_select(datafile_fontname_getter, "Select font:");
>     if (c>=0) {
>        names[0] = datafile_fontname_getter(c, NULL);
> -      f = load_font(filename, NULL, names);
> +      f = load_font(filename, NULL, (void*)names);
>     }
>     
>     unload_datafile(fonts_datafile);

Thanks, makes sense. But gcc 4.0.2 doesn't warn about it even with
-pedantic.. so want to think about it before committing. Is this a bug
in gcc? Or is there some reason behind it, and we need no (void*)?

-- 
Elias Pschernig