[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> As I'm sure everyone will see as soon as they try to look it up, Allegro
> doesn't have a usnprintf() as a counter part to libc's snprintf() (C99).
> Or rather, it does, but with the name uszprintf(). This is somewhat
> annoying and confusing. Would there be objectjons to adding usnprintf() as
> an alias for uszprintf()?
uszprintf was named that way (instead of usnprintf) because its second
argument is the size in bytes, while the second argument of usnprintf is a
number of characters. Of course not the same thing for e.g. UTF-8.
--
Eric Botcazou