[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 2005-06-18, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As I'm sure everyone will see as soon as they try to look it up, Allegro
> doesn't have a usnprintf() as a counter part to libc's snprintf() (C99).
> Or rather, it does, but with the name uszprintf(). This is somewhat
> annoying and confusing. Would there be objectjons to adding usnprintf() as
> an alias for uszprintf()?
Yes. Among the Allegro string functions, the non-'z' functions are
consistently the badly designed ones which should be avoided.
> I'd prefer for 4.2, but I'm hesitant to do it there (feature-freeze and
> all), but at least for 4.3?
I'd rather relegate all of the ustr* functions at some stage, but that's
another discussion.
Peter