| Re: [AD] Allegro 4.2.0 beta 4 deadline |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Monday 27 June 2005 13:02, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> Eh, already a case where it isn't C99 compliant. Line 24 simply declares
> an array with unspezified size. Try moving the other definition of the
> array up, it should then work..
We shouldn't be doing C99 constructs anyway. Maybe it's a good idea to set
a compiler flag to force GCC into C89 mode to catch these more easily (I
assume there is one)?
Evert