Re: [AD] No need for END_OF

Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
From: Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:32:47 +0200

> This is the approach I use.  Still has the issue of
> variables called main...  What I do is call it MAIN,
> maybe that could be the way?  Or even AL_MAIN.

I'm not sure I follow you. The main function is called `main', in lower
case. There's no way around having to `#define main ...', which is going to
break code the moment you do more than just change the name.

Evert

References:
- Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: Dustin Dettmer

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
Next by Date: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
Next by thread: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/