Re: [AD] No need for END_OF

Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
From: <spoofer255@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 10:18:46 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kJfiZmYXGHlf7HR3BIotsLCUaIpJy5U73UUdpfQYlENo85GkAKYD1CWSGuViCYoVps9cNLzJRoR4xWcNMRZSFD9n7zY36mnJlHxFyqAx4CoOMzS6kwR8UCiihSb6HujOxhhILnqN8nXLcAlrat1JjY99vpCTYMgl3cYaTqDES5M=

This new patch defines main to _mangled_main like old way but instead
of using END_OF_MAIN() to place WinMain it puts it into header. This
works fine, but trick is that compiler will generate WinMain for each
source file that includes allegro.h. GCC doesn't mind this and will
link without problem, but I'm not sure about MSVC.

Attachment: alwin.h.diff
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: Evert Glebbeek

References:
- [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: spoofer255
- Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: Evert Glebbeek

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Third beta
Next by Date: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
Next by thread: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/