Re: [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch
From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:10:32 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AhUuY8PzVHMwapo+DdtUtvs6BF/btqCdp+GFOUXWUxvsz+Uz3m6LiB6g61OmdjxRY+vv/a6wF3IPhcFc7tLZDNzfAY3wgppdlIbBlsAPgR3qLHrsrp78BXEQACyxicaLTn617WOf6TMIMEySbZ/pZcylbCbK4uWf6apHxF7zZJs=

Evert Glebbeek wrote:

+void al_blit(int flags, BITMAP *src, BITMAP *dest, int d_x, int d_y)

Personally, I'd prefer the flags to come after the two bitmaps. Eitherimmediately after, or at the end, or something. It'd better follow OOmethodology where the "object" should be the first parameter, IMO.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch
  - From: Daniel Schlyder
- Re: [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch
  - From: Evert Glebbeek

References:
- [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch
  - From: Evert Glebbeek

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch
Next by Date: Re: [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch
Previous by thread: [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch
Next by thread: Re: [AD] new_api_branch: al_create_display and blit patch

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/