Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)

Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
From: Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 00:55:11 +1000

On 2005-05-14, Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz <gradha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> It would be good if Allegro could be a normal library, and the
> mangling code was in some header file that only full featured C
> programs required, or could implement manually if desired.

And then we should move any special main() or equivalents into a
separate library.

Peter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: Michal Molhanec

References:
- [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: spoofer255
- Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
  - From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Adding some asserts
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Windows-port naming conventions
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)
Next by thread: Re: [AD] No need for END_OF_MAIN (Windows)

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/