Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
From: guilt <karthikkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 19:05:33 +0530
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=bc5LtfRJWP5cmrWM4cneVD/sEyn/3wAFBuLBkGiwc/Sm0JudupUxe/024Tz5PKxI6a6ezzfH0PLW23j1SwBInGus2lLkDvXFguiJDRz8NgeGpGp248Wb6uIn6E1I5eW/RsGIZBt24mcW4T9THrI/J4L9LUj4lsryUOn4rVmDxb0=

well.. i have no issues compiling it on MinGW, but i guess we oughtta keep the vsprintf s until we provide an alternative/implementation to vsnprintf within Allegro itself.

On 5/16/05, Michal Molhanec <michal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

guilt wrote:
> MSVC7 doesn't. the compilation failed (yesterday)

CVS version of grabber.c compiles OK

(and yes MSVC isn't and won't be C99)

--
Regards,
Michal

ICQ# 175762750

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
--
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers

--
Karthik
http://guilt.bafsoft.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
  - From: Michal Molhanec

References:
- [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
  - From: guilt
- Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
  - From: guilt
- Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
  - From: Michal Molhanec

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Grabber and vsnprintf

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/