| Re: [AD] MinGW gcc 2.95 HAVE_INTTYPES_H |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] MinGW gcc 2.95 HAVE_INTTYPES_H
- From: Ryan Patterson <cgamesplay@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:54:42 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=XOwdbI/tVg7zo5SE1qXY//KutiHzs8GVI/reg59sFwn9miwm1RtYtBNaIpqQyoKiLmCikYpKf9GevBN3Z9hfLLmCHOU4tqyaSDHdqN5nDtlIKT5/XiHjBbRqPWbXSf/yhOPY4RarPCZiceo2Gf7pJHiPWruag8QDrB9g44jhz/k=
It looks to me like we could even switch the order of the checks for
headers, trying to include stdint.h before inttypes.h
Out of curiosity, what compilers have inttypes.h?
On Apr 1, 2005 4:44 PM, Matthew Leverton <meffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following line in almngw32.h is troublesome to my copy of MinGW (gcc 2.95):
>
> #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H
>
> If commented out, it works fine. I assume this can be taken care of via a set of #ifdef's that check gcc's version?
>
> I don't know when the file is included in gcc, but it isn't in mine.
>
> --
> Matthew Leverton
> http://www.allegro.cc
>
--
Regards,
Ryan Patterson <mailto:cgamesplay@xxxxxxxxxx>