Re: [AD] makedocs BUG (CVS 19Mar)

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] makedocs BUG (CVS 19Mar)
From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:35:32 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PH8pcrCKm3wKndIwhMct0kOo2VUhcCW3YWBD+CeIwcRKm/lQLgNG5QzrXvF87Q9LrWPbUgN2tY/lBnCktXOT68SqRd+hwT//hR1ONrFyQtMAOcQ2bqtS7hrfa/MAvefng8P1lpkZXUlPSvAf19g55dtzRy01KLVv0mlIqfeO3uQ=

Eric Botcazou wrote:

I'm pretty sure c89 includes asigning to vars in the decl.


Yes, at least partially, but that's not the problem here.  See Peter's patch.


Anyone wanna add -std=c89 to GCC's command line?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] makedocs BUG (CVS 19Mar)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [AD] makedocs BUG (CVS 19Mar)
  - From: AJ
- Re: [AD] makedocs BUG (CVS 19Mar)
  - From: Michal Molhanec
- Re: [AD] makedocs BUG (CVS 19Mar)
  - From: Thomas Fjellstrom
- Re: [AD] makedocs BUG (CVS 19Mar)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+