Re: [AD] patch for detecting DX8,9

[Michal Molhanec <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

believe or not, but Microsoft is really that stupid :-)
see 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/directx9_c/directx/directxsdk/reference/directsetup/functions/directxsetupgetversion.asp

Evert Glebbeek wrote:
> +                        case 0x0001032A:
> +                        case 0x00010371:
> +                           dx_version = 0x801; /* 8.1 */
>
> Is this really correct? Are there two possible return values for DX 8.1? If 
> so, why? Also, why 0x801 rather than 0x810, as you did for the other ones?
>
> +                        case 0x00010385:
> +                           dx_version = 0x81a; /* 8.1a */
> +                           break;
> +                        case 0x00010385:
> +                           dx_version = 0x81b; /* 8.1b */
> +                           break;
> +                        case 0x00020386:
> +                           dx_version = 0x820; /* 8.2 */
> +                           break;
>
> There's a duplicate value here. What would be the correct values?


--
Regards,
    Michal