| Re: [AD] Small patch for makefile.vc |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Small patch for makefile.vc
- From: guilt <karthikkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:33:35 +0530
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=QjlWYQVfE1bSNz4SgpdbgAYi09wVLCw8OEYwQ5ugH3tcmKmHLCJkA40l0/8WqvmKHs48up+t8DBczJbZjAYF/FCOogkyC70WRRp+ta6P6rX2j0KgElkmuaEmVg1kaoGTKjzpSUagXs8x8NbJy8rDb7cGJBo/8s0W+8RyQkZqRuc=
It's called icl in Windows (it's cl-compliant, not MingW) and on Linux
it's icc (compatible with gcc) ... As such, on Windows only, it would
be best treated as MSVC itself than as a separate platform... Note
that it still uses gcc for ASMs and VC link for the linking...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:57:03 +0100, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:15, guilt wrote:
> > This small patch is being proposed to use Intel icl (it must be used
> > with VC) alternatively to the VC cl compiler .. it accepts VC compiler
> > flags.. nothing more..
>
> Would this allow Allegro to be build with the Intel C compiler? Because in
> that case, I think that making a seperate makefile.icc (or makefile.wic to
> indicate it's Windows only, not Linux) would be more appropriate.
>
> Evert
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> --
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
>
--
Karthik
http://guilt.bafsoft.net