[AD] Contribution + exunicod.c + Kannada Greeting |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [AD] Contribution + exunicod.c + Kannada Greeting
- From: Harsha <nharsha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:17:23 +0530
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=SBTMcjwuYiWLqCJCZ6Udnbtmam1rgkYIsp1giUDXZSY5YgtBD5PYtKQ/ZoX70aFJwB6Q+j0I2qUnviCEl0kW9D3Fc+rSq1yNs1odZ36Q4gZMD9a9ytSqXBXJB7GoTrNqC3bBQCkT7/7DZm6CaDe6gkDyZo2WndXl2iutHcPIK4M=
Hi
all
I have successfully added Allegro Kannada Greeting to exunicod.c I
need to submit my work, PLease provide me more information about how
to send My work when it will be approved etc..
Kannada is a Native Indian Language (People in Karnataka State of
south India speak this language).
Eagerly waiting for the replies
Harshavardhana Reddy N. <harsha at linuxmail dot org >
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:00:57 -0800,
alleg-developers-request@xxxxxxxxxx
<alleg-developers-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send Alleg-developers mailing list submissions to
> alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> alleg-developers-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> alleg-developers-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Alleg-developers digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. winXP ALT+key beep problem. (AJ)
> 2. Re: winXP ALT+key beep problem. (Evert Glebbeek)
> 3. Re: Add timeBeginPeriod(1) to wtimer.c (Evert Glebbeek)
> 4. Re: winXP ALT+key beep problem. (AJ)
> 5. Re: winXP ALT+key beep problem. (AJ)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:05:01 +1100
> From: AJ <aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [AD] winXP ALT+key beep problem.
> Reply-To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> i offer a solution in:
> http://www.allegro.cc/forums/view_thread.php?_id=465241&#target
>
> before i make a patch, can anyone comment on the need for the WS_SYSMENU
> flag in the CreateWindowEx() call.
>
> aj.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:45:19 +0100
> From: Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [AD] winXP ALT+key beep problem.
> Reply-To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> > i offer a solution in:
> > http://www.allegro.cc/forums/view_thread.php?_id=3D465241&#target
> >
> > before i make a patch, can anyone comment on the need for the WS_SYSMEN=
> U
> > flag in the CreateWindowEx() call.
>
> Well, MSDN says the following:
>
> WS_SYSMENU - Creates a window that has a Close (X) button in the non-clie=
> nt
> area.
>
> So I guess that we need it if we want the close button. Can you confirm
> that this is the case?
>
> Evert
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0100
> From: Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [AD] Add timeBeginPeriod(1) to wtimer.c
> Reply-To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Didn't think of 100...
> > More experiments: using 10 or more doesn't change the behavior. So
> > there's
> > an effect only when the requested precision is <10.
>
> Ok. I suppose that need not be too surprising.
>
> > > I agree. That'll make it post 4.2 material though.
> > So it seems. Sniff.
>
> Don't worry. We want people to have a reason to upgrade, right? ;)
>
> > When you begin to play around with my program (to be posted on the
> > forum)
> > then you might also see something of that sort: Having 3000 balls the
> > prog
> > needs about 10% cpu, 4000 balls result in about 50% cpu (on my 3GHz PC
> > at
> > work). That is with allegro unchanged.
> > No, adding timeBeginPeriod(1) to only the rest() function, 3000 balls
> > use
> > some 25-30%, but 4000 balls use hardly more than 30% also.
> > It's this kind of non-linear behavior which I find most irritating
> > here...
>
> Yeah... it's also something I don't really understand. Maybe, if the
> granularity is lower, the processor load is more constant whereas if the
> load is lower it is more strongly peaked - but how that would tweak the
> measured load in the way you describe is beyond me. Depending on how the
> load is calculated and measured (this must involve some averaging as well=
> )
> the result may not be too accurate either. Just guessing though.
>
> Evert
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:34:31 +1100
> From: AJ <aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [AD] winXP ALT+key beep problem.
> Reply-To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> >>i offer a solution in:
> >>http://www.allegro.cc/forums/view_thread.php?_id=465241&#target
> >>
> >>before i make a patch, can anyone comment on the need for the WS_SYSMENU
> >>flag in the CreateWindowEx() call.
> >
> >
> > Well, MSDN says the following:
> >
> > WS_SYSMENU - Creates a window that has a Close (X) button in the non-client
> > area.
> >
> > So I guess that we need it if we want the close button. Can you confirm
> > that this is the case?
>
> that is true.
> if you remove WS_SYSMENU from the CreateWindowEx() you do not get the
> close button (and no minimize either).
>
> lets put it back in.
>
> i also found out that you can return a value in the win_msg_proc that
> will prevent the beep. its in the MSDN docs for the WM_? msg that is
> sent when the user presses ALT+key.
>
> (haven't time right now to check, got to go to work..)
>
> aj.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:43:18 +1100
> From: AJ <aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [AD] winXP ALT+key beep problem.
> Reply-To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> the URL
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/winui/winui/windowsuserinterface/userinput/keyboardaccelerators/keyboardacceleratorreference/keyboardacceleratormessages/wm_menuchar.asp
>
> documents the WM_MENUCHAR allegro is sent when the user presses the
> ALT+key.
>
> from the MSDN doc, it says if we return MNC_CLOSE in the hi word and
> the key in the lower word, it will not issue the beep.
>
> i added this to the /allegro4.1.18/src/win/wwnd.c
> func directx_wnd_proc()
> case WM_MENUCHAR :
> return (MNC_CLOSE<<16)|(wparam&0xffff);
>
> which prevents the beep.
>
> aj.
>
> AJ wrote:
> >>> i offer a solution in:
> >>> http://www.allegro.cc/forums/view_thread.php?_id=465241&#target
> >>>
> >>> before i make a patch, can anyone comment on the need for the WS_SYSMENU
> >>> flag in the CreateWindowEx() call.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, MSDN says the following:
> >>
> >> WS_SYSMENU - Creates a window that has a Close (X) button in the
> >> non-client
> >> area.
> >>
> >> So I guess that we need it if we want the close button. Can you confirm
> >> that this is the case?
> >
> >
> > that is true.
> > if you remove WS_SYSMENU from the CreateWindowEx() you do not get the
> > close button (and no minimize either).
> >
> > lets put it back in.
> >
> > i also found out that you can return a value in the win_msg_proc that
> > will prevent the beep. its in the MSDN docs for the WM_? msg that is
> > sent when the user presses ALT+key.
> >
> > (haven't time right now to check, got to go to work..)
> >
> > aj.
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alleg-developers mailing list
> Alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
>
> End of Alleg-developers Digest
>