[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] minor issues
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:02:24 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HWmyKGGpn9e0FDf0CcfVg7ZU2keJwl5mOWy2LbcuDqPiTvoGxv0Qc1ZTbxelmZaxLovKDySkGhj56M590FojNEB85RJoKBkE3AdoSnGGSDdsgxsPT+OsMMP9bDJS9fnyhTez3EQEG5NCfJDn6seQSIlCCAkpae9Lxk4CZa4z2uI=
Peter Wang wrote:
I don't
remember if it's possible for a stride (i.e. bmp->line[1] -
bmp->line[0]) to be different from BYTES_PER_PIXEL(bpp) * bmp->w in
Allegro.
Not for memory bitmaps. Too much code (both in and out of Allegro)
assume a continuous block. System and video bitmaps, however..