| Re: [AD] Windows mouse patch |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Windows mouse patch
- From: Evert Glebbeek <evertg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:44:58 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ZVH94XhbFPmyGUYnzMa71cvsK3TYSTNXwW1z0W0dXBFMtyYC5dBxGTXM2H0HjBA/b1AcA65/wvjcHR8RsTTu6xkFhodJgeiEQL9QCy9ai4pTDIPO5RB+F4b26WYCpg30fBk8Uip60IsUgFk3+Yn0mPKaBl6Lg5JhEzh9m1XCsVI=
> > What is odd is that the person who made the patch said that it worked fine
> > for him. Hmm... I hope this isn't one of those Win9x vs WinXP things
> > again...
>
> Yes, it's odd.
Hmm... I was afraid of this. I just tried it myself, with and without
your patch, and for me it makes no difference.
> Ah, true, should be simple. I attached an *untested* patch. I can try it
> out tomorrow. It reverts the doubling of the accel factors, and fixes
> the double values. Thinking about it, something is weird.. the mouse
> seemed to be too fast for me in windows, but the doubled threshold
> actually should have made it slower. But, well, can't think right now..
> need sleep.
I don't think your patch should break anything, so I think I'm going
to include it as a last-minute fix into the WIP.
Evert