Re: [AD] GUI screen

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] GUI screen
From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:00:11 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uoYnIjnXv4fozzbDLafPbICAFEiwqYzIlVIkQDY4XQpgY934utLFXh14D1dJQj5oiri0mF6DtjEnOtmnJYxxB9/YZETHUQUNsXovjkOVVnjrNgc0iwR1tf437+yE9jjYwC77gsWJooMWexc7ZrTFHP4O99d5SikWWsBgb+SK/lg=

Elias Pschernig wrote:

But I
wonder, in this case, shouldn't gcc be clever enough to inline the
function calls anyway?

Only if the function is defined in the same source file, and if you use-finline-functions or -O3 (neither of which are used), and GCC decidesit's alright to inline said function.

References:
- [AD] GUI screen
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] GUI screen
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] GUI screen
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] GUI screen
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] GUI screen
  - From: Elias Pschernig

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Something to do?
Next by Date: Re: [AD] GUI screen
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] GUI screen
Next by thread: Re: [AD] GUI screen

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/