| Re: [AD] Re: [AL] allegro DTD |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On November 28, 2004 09:00 am, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> Oh, I sent this to the wrong list. But luckily you read this one as
> well :)
>
> On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 12:14 +0100, Stepan Roh wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> > > I have some question about that allegro.dtd in the makedoc CVS module,
> > > in case who designed it is reading this list:
> > >
> > > - Isn't there something more readable than DTD which could be used to
> > > describe the XML? :)
> >
> > XML Schema: http://w3.org/XML/Schema
>
> Ah, doesn't look much more readable after a quick glance. Anyway, this
> was rather rhetorical.. I just felt DTD it is hard to read by humans
> when trying to figure out how the XML should look (in the end I just
> scanned for !ELEMENT tags and wrote them all down).
>
This is one major reason my .tx->.xml thing isn't done. that and I had to
figure out the ._tx format from scratch :o
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx
http://strangesoft.net