Re: [AD] New END_OF_MAIN() Proposal

[Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dustin Dettmer wrote:
> I recently came up with an idea that would remove the
> need for the phrase END_OF_MAIN() after the user's
> 'main' function.  It still involves macro magic and
> the 'main' function would still need to have 'int'
> specified, but this method would pretty it up a little
> bit.

Unfortunately, using that way would cause things like:

struct {
   int value;
   char *main;
} my_struct;

to die horribly.