Re: [AD] #define dependancy patch |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] #define dependancy patch
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:39:57 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=LIwG5ZaSENGsJeGczlWSXGpAa2rw39gj7Tw7uqBMcAuLHHuQ1AkEmwDhCna2hWovu7RM9aRkwBWXrGk8+tdBViy1TGjgt1P56l+rA3NArCBPTCzYZWtTvEpkjla+0p4B55f97s5YEnTjOJCMZz7U2pQ3EMcfG22IbjUxlNr/0Vw=
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:30:32 +0200, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does anyone have any real objections to this patch?
> If not, then I think it should be applied ASAP (or the patch that caused
> teh problems this one fixes reverted).
There's a newer patch I posted on the 25th in the thread "Allegro on
amd64-linux". I'd prefer you try that one instead.
- Kitty Cat