Re: [AD] minor change to exquat

[Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Chris wrote:

> Peter Wang wrote:
>
> > -      for (index=0; index<(NUM_STEPS+1); index++) {
> > +      clear_keybuf();
> > +
> > +      for (index=0; !keypressed() && index<(NUM_STEPS+1); index++) {
>
>
> I think it would be cleaner to put:
> if(keypressed())
>    break;
> at the start of the loop instead of embedding the !keypressed() check 
> in the for() statement. IMO.


I committed Chris' version.