[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 16:06 -0700, Robert Ohannessian wrote:
> I agree. It's what I had in mind.
>
> But when incrementally improving the API, we(*) should look at the work
> that was done in defining A5; no point in adding a new function which is
> just a slightly less broken version of its A3 counterpart.
>
> (*) Whoever gets to do the work.
>
>
Ah, yes, I completely agree then. Let's incrementally (sometimes with
very small steps I guess) move towards an A5 API. 4.2, 4.4, 4.6, 4.8,
5.0. I like this idea :)
--
Elias Pschernig