[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:32, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Hmm... this is more intricate than expected, since simply using 'new'
> > requires the program to be linked against libstdc++ with GCC 3.x because
> > of the dependency upon libsupc++. Which in turn requires the autoconf
> > machinery to be tweaked. So I postpone the merging until after 4.1.10 WIP
> > is released.
>
> I decided to define dumb memory management operators to work around this
> problem so that we don't have to link against libstdc++ at all. I commited
> the tweaked test as well as the changes to the configure machinery required
> under Unix. The non-Unix stuff will quickly follow.
>
I didn't look at the code when it was first posted, but now I saw it in
the commits list and I'm wondering - doesn't it violate Allegro's coding
style of having struct/class names all uppercase?
--
Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>