RE: [AD] including allegro.h and backward compability |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]
> That's a good idea but it should be a bit more documented :-)
Sure. I grepped for ALLEGRO_NO_STD_HEADERS (or similar) to talk
about it there, but it's not documented, so I left it.
> May I ask you to add a new section to api._tx ("Deprecated
> stuff" or something
> like that) which would document the preprocessing symbol and
> list all items
> that it removes ?
I'd have expected that to be partially the point of api._tx.
Listing that in the docs is not a good thing to do, as the doc
should not know anything about old symbols, I think.
How about I add a little section about the defines that one can
use to control what the headers do, like the one I added and the
one I mentionned above, and any others in the same vein ?
--
Vincent Penquerc'h
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |