| Re: [AD] Proposal: removal of zero-sized arrays |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 October 2002 12:51, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Let's call them ISO C99 flexible array members then.
If that's the case, then does ISO C99 provide for static initialisation
of such structures? If it does, then fine - dat2c code output will be
C99 only (not a big deal since our main compiler on DOS, Windows and of
course Unix is gcc). If it does not, then we have to ask does the
ability to statically intialise such structures outweigh the required
code changes.
Are there any good references for the C99 standard? Can I browse it
online anywhere, or is it payment-only?
Bye for now,
- --
Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx
(GnuPG 04A646EA) http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9pd0FUdhclgSmRuoRAnthAJ90RDhczvD5/XGihmiZgdungQjDIgCfYyrR
KqIOql01YKNxD5royUZsyO4=
=MaPw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----